Good on Patricia De Lille and the ID. This is democracy in action. De Lille most likely noticed comments on the blogosphere and reports in the media about the ID leader’s initial call for government to regulate blogs. The result is that De Lille has swiftly issued another statement clarifying her position.

BUT I do still think there are big problems around asking government to regulate the blogosphere given the definition problems around blogs and sensitivities around free speech, never mind the issue of where the blogs are hosted and which laws they fall under.

But the other problem of course is that there are no standard ethics or an ombudsman for the blogosphere (like you would find in the media). This is nothing new and a problem recognised by bloggers themselves all around the world. There have been numerous attempts at creating universal codes of conduct for bloggers, and this is an issue still being debated to this very day. Some bloggers who don’t agree with having a code of conduct point to the self-regulating argument. I’m not sure where I stand on this, to be honest.

Below is the Amatomu tag cloud showing the buzz about De Lille in the local blogosphere (Bullard deja vu):

Below is De Lille’s latest statement

De Lille – ‘I am a living example of fighting for freedom of speech’

22-05-2007 ID President Patricia de Lille has reiterated her statement that cellphone instant-messaging service MXit is destroying relationships and allowing grown men to lure young boys and girls into traps.
ID President Patricia de Lille has reiterated her statement that cellphone instant-messaging service MXit is destroying relationships and allowing grown men to lure young boys and girls into traps.

However, De Lille says she has been misunderstood by those who, ‘like me, are believers in freedom of speech.

‘I am a living example of fighting for freedom of speech. The first court case in the New South Africa for the right to freedom of speech was fought by me and won,’ says De Lille.

‘I am making these comments about blogs and MXit in the broad context of living in a sick society where the social fabric has been destroyed, and where we struggle daily to rebuild that social fabric.

‘I appeal to parents to be proactive in controlling such services accessed by their children. I can put it out there for debate, but the response lies with the government,’ De Lille says.

She says that ‘unlike established standards of free speech applicable to print and electronic media that do not allow the dissemination of defamatory or slanderous information — bloggers can slander and defame others with impunity because they can remain anonymous.

‘I don’t and will never stand for censorship,’ De Lille says.

‘I am not bashing everybody. It is not all Internet users; it’s just a minority. Is there not a way, without dismissing the concept of blogging and MXit, to make sure that when people are defamed or slandered, they are able to take the same action to which they are entitled when it happens in print and electronic media?’

15 Responses to “De Lille answers bloggers, clarifies position”
  1. fytol rxyu pucmqf buymo

  2. buolv hnpqt nebqwy

  3. […] De Lille answers bloggers, clarifies position SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: “Patricia de Lille, Simon Grindrod and the SA male prostitute”, url: “http://capetownnews.co.za/2007/05/23/patricia-de-lille-simon-grindrod-and-the-sa-male-prostitute/” }); Related Posts […]

  4. Lipitor and impotence….

    Muscle loss due to lipitor. Lipitor….

  5. […] Journalists hitting the blogosphere is a trend that brings together two powerful publishing formats. A weakness of blogging, unlike traditional journalism, is a lack of adherence to recognised codes of conduct or ethics. On the other hand, blogs are perhaps able to deliver stories in more conversational and informal way than traditional journalism. […]

  6. But has she really changed her story? The latest statement is full of assurances that she’s opposed to censorship, but she still sticks to her claim that the government must get involved in both MXit and blogging.

    For example, she says: “I appeal to parents to be proactive in controlling such services accessed by their children. I can put it out there for debate, but the response lies with the government,” The first part is all well and good, but how exactly does the response lie with the government?

    And she still wants the government to prevent bloggers from blogging anonymously, as she clearly still maintains that some way must be found to hold all bloggers accountable for their words and prevent anonymity from being a protection. From what I can see, she still wants the government to regulate blogging.

    This just proves she’s learnt nothing from the reporting over the last few days. The blog that riled her up isn’t even hosted in South Africa, so it will be entirely unaffected by any knee-jerk South African legislation and regulation.

    In all honesty, it is examples like this that are the reason I’m drifting towards being a small government libertarian. With the world becoming more complex by the day and politicians seemingly becoming ever more stupid, I’d prefer it if they had as little opportunity as possible to control the things they clearly don’t understand.

  7. Her response just confirms that she shouted her mouth off about something that she and her advisors clearly due not have a clue about – turning her into the laughing stock that she now has become. Talk about Bozone. If she wanted to draw attention to the fact that a male prostitute said he had sex with Grindod – she had brilliant success!!! Politicians should not talk about things they do not understand… hey wait… that is wait they do for a living!

  8. Wow.. amazing how she suddenly changes her story.

Comments are closed.